|
|
Endorsement of a candidate is a fairly thorough and rigorous process. The committee evaluates candidates based on a number of criteria including:
Candidate Questionnaires: Each candidate is sent a comprehensive candidate questionnaire asking a variety of questions on right-to-life issues. While the questionnaires are available for public review, candidate responses are kept confidential. All candidates, including incumbents, must return the survey if they want to be considered for an endorsement. Beginning with some basic philosophical and scientific questions on human life and Roe v. Wade, questions range from abortion restrictions to human cloning, euthanasia and political free speech.
Once questionnaires are returned, responses are tabulated and scored according to a point system. Questionnaires with higher scores are treated more favorable.
Incumbency: Voting
Record:
Voter Demographics: Voter demographics are also considered in the endorsement process as it may ultimately foretell the outcome of the race. In a "district" where a Republican candidate is outnumbered by Democratic voters, that candidate may not have enough Republicans to elect him/her to office. Although the candidate will receive the PAC's endorsement, the outcome is almost always predetermined.
Candidate Background and Temperament: Also important is a candidate's electability. Candidates who do not exhibit a temperament for public office will most likely not be endorsed. Candidates with serious or questionable legal or personal problems will also not receive an endorsement. Oftentimes, personality issues will be discovered during the interview process. Kansans for Life's Political Action Committee is very protective of its reputation as an authority on pro-life candidates and the political process. |
|
Endorsements made by KFL PAC, are not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
Paid for by Kansans for Life PAC
Archie Macias, Treasurer
Copyright ©
2005
Kansans for Life Political Action Committee
|